AISLE Uncovered 5 of 7 OpenSSL Vulnerabilities in the April 2026 Release

Author

AISLE Research Team

Published

OpenSSL

See what AISLE can find and fix autonomously in your own code.

Sovereign AI CybersecurityTalk to Us

As AI-powered vulnerability detection commands attention in newsrooms and boardrooms alike, AISLE’s autonomous system has discovered five of the seven security issues patched in the April release of OpenSSL 3.5.6. Since AI champions like Tencent and Anthropic also reported a few vulnerabilities, these findings serve to shed light on a critical question: do high-powered models find more security vulnerabilities than multi-model systems?

OpenSSL is an ideal testing ground for emerging approaches to autonomous cybersecurity. As one of the world’s most widely adopted cryptographic libraries, it is widely recognized as a mature, highly secure codebase. Yet in the six months since October 2025, AISLE found 20 security vulnerabilities significant enough to warrant CVE designation, including the first high severity issue discovered since 2022.

These findings indicate that multi-model systems can detect more vulnerabilities than even the most highly powered models, and at a fraction of the cost.

The Discoveries

All of the following were responsibly disclosed by researchers from AISLE. Two were also fixed using patches generated by AISLE’s autonomous vulnerability management platform:

  • CVE-2026-28386 (9.1 CVSS Score) — Out-of-bounds read (up to 15 bytes) in the AES-CFB-128 assembly path on x86-64 CPUs with AVX-512/VAES when processing partial blocks at a page boundary; can crash the process (DoS). (Simultaneously reported and fixed by Alex Gaynor of Anthropic)
  • CVE-2026-28390 (7.5 CVSS Score) — NULL pointer dereference in CMS EnvelopedData handling when KeyTransportRecipientInfo uses RSA-OAEP and the SourceFunc parameters field is absent; same CMS_decrypt() DoS exposure on untrusted input. (Simultaneously reported by researchers from Tencent)
  • CVE-2026-28388 (5.9 CVSS Score) — NULL pointer dereference while processing a delta CRL that carries a Delta CRL Indicator but omits the required CRL Number extension; causes a crash (DoS) during X.509 verification with X509_V_FLAG_USE_DELTAS.
  • CVE-2026-28389 (5.9 CVSS Score) — NULL pointer dereference in CMS EnvelopedData handling when KeyAgreeRecipientInfo omits the optional algorithm parameters field; CMS_decrypt() on attacker-controlled input crashes before any crypto runs (DoS). (Simultaneously reported by researchers at Praetorian, Seoul National University, and Tencent)
  • CVE-2026-28387 (3.7 CVSS Score) — Use-after-free / double-free in the DANE client when a server publishes TLSA records mixing PKIX-TA(0)/PKIX-EE(1) with DANE-TA(2); can corrupt memory or enable code execution on affected clients.

Implications for AI-Powered Vulnerability Detection

AISLE’s latest OpenSSL discoveries shed light on a high-stakes debate over the right path forward for AI-powered cybersecurity. In April of 2026, Anthropic’s Mythos announcement launched AI-powered vulnerability detection into public awareness. To some, it seemed that expensive, high-powered frontier models would massively outperform more affordable security analyzers.

Yet as decision makers worried about securing their code bases against an AI so powerful that only a handful of enterprises can be entrusted with it, researchers found that open source models could produce the same results, for up to 600x less compute cost.

In fact, AISLE’s co-founder Stanislav Fort rapidly built a system that surfaced real vulnerabilities in FreeBSD and OpenBSD, even after they were scanned by Mythos. It’s available as free open-source software.

So when AISLE’s autonomous system discovered five OpenSSL vulnerabilities while Anthropic only reported one, it validated the premise underlying Fort’s research. AISLE’s autonomous system makes use of multiple models to build an understanding of each codebase it analyzes. Rather than treating vulnerability detection as a problem to be solved by brute power, it matches the capabilities of each model with the discrete problem they solve, whether that be broad-spectrum scanning, vulnerability analysis, or triage.

These real-world results indicate that when it comes to finding security issues in mature, robust codebases, thoughtfully designed security systems outperform high-powered models. That they do so at a fraction of the cost is of secondary importance to the fundamental mission of securing code.

AISLE’s Multi-Model Platform is Available Now

The AISLE system has discovered 20 OpenSSL vulnerabilities in the last six months, which is why we believe in making it available to defenders. If you’d like to see what our autonomous vulnerability management platform will find in your codebase, request a demo.


AISLE researchers contributing to these discoveries include Stanislav Fort, Pavel Kohout, Igor Morgenstern, and Joshua Rogers. Our appreciation goes to the OpenSSL team for their continued collaboration and professionalism.

Keep reading

More from AISLE

FeaturedResearchAISLE Discovered Six curl CVEs After OpenAI and Anthropic Found ZeroAfter frontier AI systems came up empty, AISLE surfaced six CVEs in curl, one of the world's most audited codebases. Its maintainers patched all six.Stanislav FortSeptember 2, 2026ResearchAISLE Discovers 6 High and Critical CVEs in FFmpegAISLE's AI-native engine found six high and critical CVEs in FFmpeg, including a 9.8 remote heap overflow and a stack overflow that survived 19 years.AISLE Research Team August 27, 2026ResearchAttackers Are Using AI to Find Vulnerabilities in Your Code. Your SAST Was Never Even Looking for ThemCan AI-native code analysis replace SAST, or is it just a complement. Here's what data from real-world results shows.Ondrej VlcekAugust 12, 2026ResearchAISLE Finds 21 Security Issues in FFmpeg, Including 6 New CVEsAISLE uncovered 21 issues in FFmpeg, including 6 new CVEs spanning code execution and out-of-bounds reads. All patched, with commit links inside.AISLE Research Team August 5, 2026ResearchAISLE Discovers a One-Click RCE Vulnerability in Cursor, VS Code, and Google AntigravityLearn how our AI found a one-click RCE vulnerability in 3 code editors: Cursor, VS Code, and Google Antigravity.Stanislav FortJuly 31, 2026ResearchThe Model That Fixes Your Code Might Hack the Linux KernelLearn how easy it is to trojanize a model, and what defenders can do to protect their supply chains from this emerging threat.Patrik MadaJuly 28, 2026PerspectivesThe Economics of Security Vulnerabilities: Why Discovery Is Not CommoditizingIf discovery is cheap, why are people willing to pay more for exploits than ever before? Here's what the market for exploits shows.Ondrej VlcekJuly 23, 2026ResearchAISLE Finds 8 CVEs Across MySQL, MariaDB, and PostgreSQLLearn how AISLE found 8 CVEs in critical databases using autonomous, AI-native analysis and verification.AISLE Research Team July 7, 2026ResearchAISLE Discovers 6 New CVEs in curl, Including the Oldest Issue Ever ReportedAISLE's analyzer discovered 6 new CVEs in curl, more than 2x the nearest AI security platform and including the oldest security issue in the project.AISLE Research Team June 24, 2026